What share of your alumni can you still reach at ninety days. What share of your admissions alumni actually drive. What missing between-session evidence costs you in authorization fights. Nobody has ever measured any of it. This October we publish the first benchmark, and the founding cohort is open now.
Most treatment organizations say they run an alumni program, and no published benchmark exists anywhere in behavioral health for community engagement, family participation, referral economics, or the evidence those programs leave on the table. Treatment outcomes are measured. The community around the client is not.
We define community the way the evidence does: it begins the day someone commits to treatment, not the day they leave, and it includes clients in care, the alumni before them, and the families beside both. Every metric ships with an open definition anyone may adopt.
Share of alumni reachable at thirty, ninety, one hundred eighty, and three hundred sixty-five days.
Alumni share of admissions, whether the ask is systematic, and how readmissions are captured.
Structured family programming, and families still engaged ninety days after a discharge. A first anywhere.
Between-session visibility, measurement-based care on schedule, and days lost in the past ninety.
Denial rates, resubmission discipline, value-based participation, and what operators want to prove.
Every metric defined in writing, free for anyone to adopt, including people who compete with us.
Cuepri builds software for provider-led communities, so we have an obvious interest in what this study finds. The only defence against that is method, stated in advance and held to in public. A benchmark that flatters its publisher is worth nothing.
Participate and opt in, and you earn a private thirty-minute readout plus founding-cohort credit in the report.
Fielding closes Friday, October 9, and the founding cohort closes with it. Complete the survey, opt in, and your readout is booked before the report reaches the field.
